PEER REVIEW POLICY
All the articles of The Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation undergo a double - blind peer review process to maintain standards of research quality and credibility in accordance to the following procedure:
Initial review. The Editor-in-Chief evaluates each manuscript to determine if its topic and content is within the scope of the Journal concept and meets the minimum Journal requirements and criteria.
Peer review. The Journal employs the double-blind peer review process, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process. The Editor-in-Chief selects two Editorial Board reviewers based on their expertise in the field. The author's name and credentials are removed prior to the forwarding of a manuscript to a Reviewer in order to promote objectivity and ensure that a manuscript is fairly judged based on its content and contribution to the field.
Article acceptance. After collecting and assessing the reviews, the Editor-in-Chief makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and informs the authors about the decision by email. If the Reviewers indicate that the manuscript needs revisions and alterations, the Editor-in-Chief informs the author accordingly and jointly decide on the period of the next re-submission.
All the articles of The Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation undergo a double - blind peer review process to maintain standards of research quality and credibility in accordance to the following procedure:
Initial review. The Editor-in-Chief evaluates each manuscript to determine if its topic and content is within the scope of the Journal concept and meets the minimum Journal requirements and criteria.
Peer review. The Journal employs the double-blind peer review process, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process. The Editor-in-Chief selects two Editorial Board reviewers based on their expertise in the field. The author's name and credentials are removed prior to the forwarding of a manuscript to a Reviewer in order to promote objectivity and ensure that a manuscript is fairly judged based on its content and contribution to the field.
Article acceptance. After collecting and assessing the reviews, the Editor-in-Chief makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and informs the authors about the decision by email. If the Reviewers indicate that the manuscript needs revisions and alterations, the Editor-in-Chief informs the author accordingly and jointly decide on the period of the next re-submission.